Screen
Use ranges for volume, cost, coverage, and benefit. Apply a large haircut.
- Decision: investigate or reject
- Evidence: owner interviews and available records
AI ROI equals confidence-adjusted business benefit minus total implementation and operating cost, divided by total cost. For automation, keep labor capacity, avoided rework, loss reduction, and incremental margin separate. This calculator models one workflow over a chosen horizon, shows released hours separately, and makes every assumption editable so finance can replace estimates with measured evidence.
Estimate confidence-adjusted benefit, total cost, net benefit, ROI, payback, and capacity released for one defined workflow. Use the output as a hypothesis to validate: not as a promise.
Privacy: all inputs and calculations remain in your browser. This page does not submit calculator values. Do not enter personal, confidential, regulated, or client-identifying data.
AI ROI is measured value minus total cost, divided by total cost, over a fixed period. A defensible number follows four steps from the Proof Standard:
Count the full cost: licenses, model usage, integration, change management, monitoring and human review. To include advisory fees in the total cost, check current AI consultant hourly rates.
AI ROI = (measured value minus total cost) / total cost. Multiply the result by 100 to express it as a percentage.
These illustrative numbers show a monthly operating return. The cost per case below excludes the separate AI run cost.
Add the setup cost to calculate payback. These numbers are illustrative, not a benchmark. To build a measured baseline before you invest, see the AI Growth Readiness Audit.
Use the calculator below for a full-period estimate that includes setup and recurring costs. Its editable defaults describe a separate illustrative workflow.
The defaults are an illustration. Replace them with a measured baseline and use a conservative confidence adjustment until production evidence exists.
To measure ROI across a whole program, the AI Growth Readiness Audit reviews your evidence. It includes 80 hours over six weeks.
Most AI ROI claims fail for one of these reasons:
Only 39% of organizations report any enterprise-level EBIT impact from AI, and most of those attribute less than 5% of EBIT to AI. Source: McKinsey, The State of AI in 2025. This survey records self-reported results. EBIT means earnings before interest and taxes.
For what published studies actually measured, read the enterprise AI failure rate study. Check each study's definition, sample and measurement period before comparing it with your workflow.
For a model-governance failure in practice, read the Zillow AI pricing lesson. A good forecast alone does not establish that the operating model can absorb errors.
The model separates capacity from realized financial value. Finance should approve which released hours become avoided cost, additional throughput, or another measured benefit.
| Output | Formula | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline labor cost | Monthly volume × minutes ÷ 60 × loaded hourly cost × months | Current cost of the workflow before AI |
| Capacity value | Baseline labor cost × coverage × time reduction | Economic value of time released if finance accepts the conversion mechanism |
| Other benefit | Monthly contribution benefit × months | Avoided rework, reduced loss, or incremental contribution margin |
| Adjusted benefit | (Capacity value + other benefit) × (1 − confidence haircut) | Conservative benefit used in ROI and payback |
| Total cost | Implementation cost + monthly run cost × months | One-time and recurring cost over the selected horizon |
| ROI | (Adjusted benefit − total cost) ÷ total cost × 100 | Net return relative to total cost |
| Payback | Implementation cost ÷ (monthly adjusted benefit − monthly run cost) | Months to recover implementation cost when monthly net benefit is positive |
The defaults assume 12,000 monthly tasks, 12 minutes per task, and a USD 65 loaded hourly cost. The 12-month baseline labor cost is USD 1,872,000. The model applies 70% workflow coverage, 60% time reduction, and a 25% confidence adjustment. This produces USD 589,680 in adjusted benefit. Total cost is USD 210,000, yielding USD 379,680 net benefit and approximately 181% ROI. These figures are illustrative and do not describe a client result.
Do not double count: if released hours enable additional throughput, count either the accepted capacity value or the incremental contribution margin attributable to that throughput unless finance can show they are economically distinct.
The purpose of the first estimate is to decide whether to fund evidence. Confidence should rise only as assumptions become observed results.
Use ranges for volume, cost, coverage, and benefit. Apply a large haircut.
Replace volume, handling time, quality, exceptions, and loaded cost with measured data.
Replace coverage, time reduction, quality, adoption, and run cost with controlled-test results.
Track realized cost, throughput, quality, risk, adoption, and exceptions against the baseline.
Calculate confidence-adjusted benefit from labor capacity, avoided rework, reduced loss, or incremental contribution margin over a fixed period. Subtract implementation and recurring costs to get net benefit, then divide net benefit by total cost. Keep each benefit category separate, use a pre-deployment baseline, and avoid counting the same value twice.
No. Time saved creates capacity, not automatically cash. It becomes a financial benefit only when the company reduces overtime, contractor or vendor spend, avoids planned hiring, increases throughput with demand, or redeploys capacity to measured higher-value work. The calculator reports released hours separately so finance can decide what portion is realizable.
Include discovery, process redesign, data preparation, integration, model or vendor fees, evaluation, security, privacy, governance, change management, training, monitoring, support, internal staff time, and decommissioning or exit costs. Separate one-time implementation cost from recurring monthly cost, and run downside cases for adoption delays, lower coverage, and model changes.
There is no universal percentage. Use a larger haircut when the baseline, adoption, data, workflow coverage, evaluation, or benefit conversion is uncertain. Replace the haircut with measured evidence as the project progresses. This calculator starts at 25 percent as an editable illustration, not a benchmark or recommendation for a specific company.
A credible estimate names the workflow, baseline period, volume, loaded cost, benefit mechanism, adoption assumption, quality threshold, implementation and recurring cost, measurement window, finance owner, and stop condition. Validate in production against a comparable baseline or controlled test. Vendor case-study averages are context, not proof of your company’s result.

Paul Okhrem reads every brief personally. Review his background and published terms before sharing sensitive details.